The Starfish and the Spider:

If you lop off the head of a spider, it dies. It is a very
centralized organization.


If you cut off the leg of a starfish, it will grow a new leg, and
the leg will grow a new starfish. It is a very decentralized
organization.


Question: what kind of organization is the church? What kind of
organization should it be?


Starfish style organizations are multiplying . . .


AA is a starfish organization. No president. No leader. Or, more
precisely, everyone is a leader. No one owns AA. No one has any idea
how many members they have. Suffice it to say, a lot!


Wikipedia Arguably the
largest depository of information on the planet and it is all user
created. You can edit the content yourself. Users decide what is
included and what is not. Very decentralized.


Napster--the old Napster
before the feds got a hold of it--very decentralized. And, in
various incarnations, the idea continues to thrive because of its
decentralization.


OpenOffice. A Microsoft
office look-alike. All user created. All free. Very decentralized.


The House Church Movement in America is another example of a
starfish movement. From all accounts, it is growing and growing
rapidly. Consider these facts for the North American Mission Board's
Center for Missional Research
http://www.namb.net/cmr (This is gathering information from
several sources. There is some discrepancy between the findings.)



  • House churches have shown remarkable growth in the past
    decade—shooting up from just 1% to near double-digit
    involvement.

  • Zogby poll: We asked, "Do you meet weekly with a group of 20
    people or less to pray and study scriptures as your primary form
    of spiritual or religious gathering?" Remarkably, 26.3% of the
    3600 sampled Americans who were asked that question indicated that they
    did—as their primary form of spiritual or religious gathering.

  • One out of five adults attends a house church at least once
    a month.  

  • It's estimated that more than 70 million adults have at
    least experimented with house church participation.     

  • In a typical week, roughly 20 million adults attend a house
    church gathering. Over the course of a typical month, that
    number doubles to about 43 million adults.      

  • Millions of Americans are intermittently engaged in a house
    church, alternating back and forth between house church and
    conventional church. (For clarity, the survey distinguished
    between involvement in a house church and participation in a
    small group that is associated with a conventional church.)     
    The Barna survey revealed that of those who attend a house
    church, 27% attend on a weekly basis, 30% attend one to three
    times per month, and 43% attend less than once a month.


There is an explosive house church movement in our land. It is a
decentralized, leaderless, starfish movement. How should we respond? As I see it,
we could take one of three approaches.


Ignore it


This was my approach at first. It seems too big a movement to
ignore.


Bring a bucket of water


As I have had the opportunity to talk to church leaders about the
house church movement, this is the most common response. The
conversation usually includes this sentence: "Well, those house
churches are all well and good, but I just think there should be
some accountability."


I am thinking, "Accountability to whom?" and I think I know the
answer. I think he is sitting across the table from me.


But, if this house church is a real church, I thought we believed
in the autonomy of the local church. I thought we believed local
churches were not accountable to anyone except each other and God.


The Catholic Church is very spider-like. It is very centralized.
Very command and control. The protestant movement was much more
decentralized. Baptists in particular are extremely decentralized. I
have always thought the name Independent Baptist was a bit
redundant. What other kind of Baptist is there?


The House Church movement begs the question: how far do you press
that?


Bring a bucket of gasoline


Well, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out I
think this is the best approach.


What would you call a ten fold increase in house churches in ten
years approaching 25% of the  population. They have done that
with no budget, no money, no visible leaders, no literature, no
program, no nothing. I would call it a movement of God. If it is a
movement of God, I think we do well to fan it into flames lest we
find ourselves opposing what God is doing.


Local churches can do at least three things to partner with and
encourage house churches:



  • Identify them. See if you can identify
    people in your church that are participating in an independent
    home Bible Study. Get their names, phone numbers and email
    addresses.

  • Encourage them. Validate what they are
    doing. They are studying the Bible and fellowshipping. It is a
    good thing. Don't make them feel like rebels. They are not
    rebels. Some of them are good members of your church. Just as
    some of your church members attend other activities at other
    churches, some of your church members may be a part of a House
    Church. (Approximately 20% of those who go to church routinely
    attend more than one church.) Validate them publically from the
    pulpit. Encourage them privately.

  • Train them without trying to control them.
    Provide training and resources if they want it. Don't try to
    control them. These are independent churches. You wouldn't want
    your Association trying to control you; don't try to control
    them.

  • Create networking opportunities. People
    like to fellowship with like-minded individuals. There are many
    house church networks in major cities across America. Identify
    any that exist in your area. Allow them to use your building if
    they want to have occasional large-group networking meetings.

  • Pray for them; pray with them. It is my
    prayer that America will come to Christ. My vision is that they
    can do this through doubling groups. It seems that God is doing
    a new thing in a multiplying movement of doubling house groups.
    I think it will happen through all kinds of churches--mega
    churches, house churches, new churches, old churches. Pray for
    this movement.


To respond to this, go to
www.sundayschool.ning.com


To read more on this, pick up a copy of

The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless
Organizations by Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to keep the next generation in church.

Image
The latest research indicates that 70% of the kids who grow up in our youth groups are not staying in church. Project that out for about ten years and we have disaster. Based on data from Essential Church, the trend looks like this: For a free sample of the book, see http://www.lifeway.com/lwc/files/lwcF_PDF_Rainers_Essential_Church_Sample.pdf Another good book on the subject is Ed Stetzer's Lost and Found. Let's look at it more personally. My oldest son graduated from High School in 2004. He walked across the stage at church at the recognition ceremony along with 20 or so of his classmates. Most of them had been very active in youth group. Very few of them are active in church today. In fact, my son may be the only one. If you are in the mood for a good depression, do the math at your church. Dig up the list of the kids that graduated five years ago. See if you can figure out how many of them are in church
Read more

Sunday School revival

It is amazing what happens when you listen to people. Everyone should be slow to speak and quick to listen. Somebody smart wrote that! For the last several months I have been listening to the people who attend my conferences. I have been using a very simple evaluation form -- one with two questions: What did you like? What could I improve? People always said kind things. I think that has more to do with them being kind than anything I did. I was not surprised at all by two of the suggestions. I was shocked by the third. I didn't actually track it, but it was probably the most common suggestion for change. First, here are the two I was not surprised by. Slow down. I work on that, but unsuccessfully. You just get me talking about doubling groups and I get all fired up. Provide a fill-in-the-blanks note-taking piece. I actually used to do this. Occasionally hosts would drop the ball and not make copies. I always did better when that was the case. I just speak better w
Read more

Puzzling data regarding lecturing teachers

Image
Many of you know I am working on a new book on What Makes Groups Grow. I am puzzling just now over the data regarding teachers to lecture. Here is the puzzle: Teachers who use all lecture were the second mostly likely group to be growing Teachers who use all lecture were also the most likely group to be declining (by a wide margin) I have my own theories as to why this is true. What do you make of it? How could the lecturing group be both likely to grow and likely to decline?
Read more